Raptors Forum | Toronto Raptors Forums & Message Boards

Raptors Forum | Toronto Raptors Forums & Message Boards (http://www.raptorsforum.com/f/)
-   Entertainment Lounge (http://www.raptorsforum.com/f/f9/)
-   -   Michael Jackson not the biological father of "his" kids (http://www.raptorsforum.com/f/f9/michael-jackson-not-biological-father-his-kids-8599.html)

jeffb 06-28-2009 04:35 PM

Michael Jackson not the biological father of "his" kids
 
This is nowhere near a surprise to anyone who's seen these kids.

Quote:


Now that he has passed, EVERYONE is coming out the woodworks talking about his tortured, drug-crippled life. Including the woman whom is the biological mother to two of his three children.

In a new interview, Debbie Rowe, Michael's wife after Lisa Marie Presley, confesses that she was artificially inseminated by an anonymous donor.

Was the sperm donor white????

And, contrary to speculation, despite Jackson's death, Rowe reveals that she does not want custody of the children. In fact, she expects to never see them again.

Who will be responsible for those poor kids?

That remains to be seen.

Speaking exclusively at her home, Debbie says: "Michael was divorced, lonely and wanted children. I was the one who said to him, 'I will have your babies'. I offered him my womb - it was a gift. It was something I did to keep him happy. I went to the 'office', which is what we called the medical clinic. They impregnated me. It's just like I impregnate my mares for breeding. It was very technical. Just like I stick the sperm up my horse, this is what they did to me. I was his thoroughbred."

Sad. Children are not puppies!

Debbie says she was "impregnated" like one of the thoroughbred mares she now keeps on her property, adding: "I was just the vessel. It wasn't Michael's sperm. I got paid for it, and I've moved on. I know I will never see my children again."

Rowe also claims thatů.

- Jackson never had sex with her throughout their marriage and parenthood.
- She offered to have babies for him after he told her that his first wife Lisa Marie Presley had refused to bear him any.
- Michael arranged for a sham marriage to make them appear like a family.
- He cruelly ditched her when the painful second birth left her "all torn up inside" and unable to give him any more kids.

About her "split" with Jackson, she says, "After the second birth had so many problems, he knew I couldn't have kids any more. He didn't want anything to do with me. He took the kids. The settlement was written up, and he just wanted me to be quiet."

About her fake "relationship" with Michael, she says the marriage was consummated not with a night of passion or a honeymoon - but with a peck on the cheek from Jackson, who retired by himself to another room. "He wanted to pretend that we were a family. But we never lived together as a couple. We never had sex. He was on the road, doing his thing. He never wanted to live with me. That's why he bought me a house. There was always 'my house' and 'his house', never 'our house'. We would jump in bed together and read magazines and watch movies, with all the animals around us before the kids were involved. We used to hang out with each other. But that was his life. That's Michael. That was what it was like."

And, Debbie insists, that she is not cut out to be a mother and definitely does not wan Jackson's children. "I was never a good mother, I never felt any attachment to them. It was a better feeling giving them to him than it was keeping them as my own. I know I will never see them again. I was never cut out to be a mother - I was no good. I don't want these children in my life. My children are my animals now."

All so sad and unfortunate

B-RAD 06-28-2009 05:05 PM

wow, i always wondered who would have sex with michael jackson after he started to get all weird. the answer is no one. sad but, kind of fitting. he probably got something done down there and he couldn't make babies.

Febreezy 06-28-2009 05:06 PM

Wow.
King of pop not wanting sex?

jeffb 06-28-2009 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Febreezy (Post 199944)
Wow.
King of pop not wanting sex?

Shocking.....well not really. :dead:

B-RAD 06-28-2009 05:10 PM

ya, it's like i said sad. but, not really shocking. to be honest, i could care less, he wanted kids, he got kids and now who gives a shit cause he's dead.

jeffb 06-28-2009 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B-RAD (Post 199948)
ya, it's like i said sad. but, not really shocking. to be honest, i could care less, he wanted kids, he got kids and now who gives a shit cause he's dead.

It does matter but only if the Mothers want the Kids. And with at least two of them, it isn't the case. That is really sad.

Torontosaurus 06-28-2009 06:38 PM

Uh, the guy had like a trillion fans, tons of PYT's screaming his name in every country he visited, I'm sure there are some who would love to have had his babies, but I think he wanted to be the sole parent in charge of his kids and didn't want any strings attached to his "family"


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright RaptorsForum.com 2005-2011


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24