Raptors Forum | Toronto Raptors Forums & Message Boards

Raptors Forum | Toronto Raptors Forums & Message Boards (http://www.raptorsforum.com/f/)
-   NBA Talk (http://www.raptorsforum.com/f/f6/)
-   -   Arenas served court papers during game (http://www.raptorsforum.com/f/f6/arenas-served-court-papers-during-game-19241.html)

jeffb 02-05-2011 08:46 AM

Arenas served court papers during game
 
Quote:

Orlando guard Gilbert Arenas(notes) was served with child support and custody papers as he left the court during halftime of the Magic's game against Miami.

A process server stopped Arenas as he walked off the court during Thursday night's loss to the Heat. The court documents, obtained by The Associated Press, were a California petition filed by Laura Mendoza Govan. She identified herself as his ex-girlfriend in the documents.

The petition seeks custody and child support for three children that Govan says Arenas fathered and has since "financially cut off." She is also seeking support for another unborn child as well monthly support for the other children.

In the petition, she is seeking US$109,000 in monthly support payments from Arenas and $1.3 million annually.

Govan could not be reached for comment.

A hearing in the case has been set for March 8 in Los Angeles. Orlando plays at Sacramento on March 9. Arenas and the Magic played at Washington on Friday night.

The guard was unavailable for comment, but his lawyer, Lisa Fishberg of Washington-based Schertler & Onorato, said in a written statement that, "This is a private matter involving young children. It is inappropriate for Ms. Govan and her attorneys to attempt to turn it into a public spectacle."


Arenas served court petition during game - NBA - Yahoo! Canada Sports

MrClutch 02-05-2011 09:38 AM

see this is what i would hate as an athlete, how do you need 1.3 mill to take care of kids?

'trane 02-05-2011 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrdependent (Post 504885)
see this is what i would hate as an athlete, how do you need 1.3 mill to take care of kids?

that's not what it's about.

LilRomeo 02-05-2011 12:11 PM

He'll file a consumer proposal, if not Chapter 12, after 5-6 years of his retirement.

Superjudge 02-05-2011 01:11 PM

I don't think any of us has any real place discussing this situation as if we know whats going on.

jeffb 02-05-2011 01:13 PM

109,000/month

Insanity!

MrClutch 02-05-2011 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'trane (Post 504903)
that's not what it's about.

then what is it about? its all about the money

'trane 02-05-2011 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrdependent (Post 504963)
then what is it about? its all about the money

spousal and child support payments are not about what you need to take care of kids. it's about what the parent is able to provide and what the child has a right to as his/her dependant. additionally, it's about the standard of living that the child's mother has a right to, depending on the nature of her and the father's relationship. it is most definitely not about what the mother 'needs' to raise the children.

jeffb 02-05-2011 01:21 PM

Man i don't ever want kids.

'trane 02-05-2011 01:22 PM

yes jeff, we've been over that before. we all know.

jeffb 02-05-2011 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'trane (Post 504971)
yes jeff, we've been over that before. we all know.

Yeah, well i'm reiterating it again.

LX 02-05-2011 02:29 PM

and the world is grateful:5fj8zp:

Beesh 02-05-2011 03:07 PM

this is the same chick that was supposedly cheating with Shaq right awhile ago

Barracuda 02-05-2011 03:22 PM

C'est la vie.

Psi 02-05-2011 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'trane (Post 504969)
spousal and child support payments are not about what you need to take care of kids. it's about what the parent is able to provide and what the child has a right to as his/her dependant.

While I agree this is how it is, this isn't how it should work.

Child Support for situations like this should be something around 5k/month PLUS 250k/year into an account that the child can access when they're 18.
Quote:

additionally, it's about the standard of living that the child's mother has a right to, depending on the nature of her and the father's relationship. it is most definitely not about what the mother 'needs' to raise the children.
No, the mother doesn't have a right to a new standard of living because she was a cheap one night stand.
Simply put, bitch is in it for the money.
The kids likely wont see much of it at all.

'trane 02-05-2011 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psi (Post 505077)
While I agree this is how it is, this isn't how it should work.

Child Support for situations like this should be something around 5k/month PLUS 250k/year into an account that the child can access when they're 18.

No, the mother doesn't have a right to a new standard of living because she was a cheap one night stand.
Simply put, bitch is in it for the money.
The kids likely wont see much of it at all.

well, that's why i said 'depending on the nature of their relationship'.

that said, how do you have 3 (and a 4th on the way) kids with someone after a 'cheap one night stand'?

and, given the length of their relationship and the clear intent to be the parents of at least a few kids, arenas has a legal (and i would argue moral) responsibility to take care of them and provide support for them. and the law indicates (quite rightly) that it is not the basic minimum that someone owes, but rather a payment in line with their income, with the expectations that the child is a part of that extended family relationship, and with the standard of living that comes with that family.

i have no idea what your knowledge of family law is, but your point about 5k per month, etc, is not in line with any legal system in the developed world. there might just be a few good reasons for that.

Don Vito 02-05-2011 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'trane (Post 505114)
well, that's why i said 'depending on the nature of their relationship'.

that said, how do you have 3 (and a 4th on the way) kids with someone after a 'cheap one night stand'?

and, given the length of their relationship and the clear intent to be the parents of at least a few kids, arenas has a legal (and i would argue moral) responsibility to take care of them and provide support for them. and the law indicates (quite rightly) that it is not the basic minimum that someone owes, but rather a payment in line with their income, with the expectations that the child is a part of that extended family relationship, and with the standard of living that comes with that family.

i have no idea what your knowledge of family law is, but your point about 5k per month, etc, is not in line with any legal system in the developed world. there might just be a few good reasons for that.

Looks like someone knows a little too much about this subject :reporter:

'trane 02-05-2011 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don Vito (Post 505115)
Looks like someone knows a little too much about this subject :reporter:

looks like my wife and partner of 13 years is a lawyer :reporter:

Ligeia 02-05-2011 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psi (Post 505077)
While I agree this is how it is, this isn't how it should work.

Child Support for situations like this should be something around 5k/month PLUS 250k/year into an account that the child can access when they're 18.

No, the mother doesn't have a right to a new standard of living because she was a cheap one night stand.
Simply put, bitch is in it for the money.
The kids likely wont see much of it at all.

Maybe Arenas got what he wanted (the pussy) and now she'll get what she wants (the money). Seems like a fair exchange to me. If you don't want to pay child support proportional to your income, don't fuck the "bitch". Pretty simple.

MrClutch 02-05-2011 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'trane (Post 504969)
spousal and child support payments are not about what you need to take care of kids. it's about what the parent is able to provide and what the child has a right to as his/her dependant. additionally, it's about the standard of living that the child's mother has a right to, depending on the nature of her and the father's relationship. it is most definitely not about what the mother 'needs' to raise the children.

this is how i see it, from what i know gilbert gives her 20,000 and i dont know if thats a week or if thats a month or etc. if she needed any more money, why doesnt she get a job like any hard working mom or dad?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright RaptorsForum.com 2005-2011


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24