Why has DD never been tried at the 3? - Page 2
Old 01-15-2012, 10:36 PM   #21 (permalink)
chucking wood like a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood

Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 728
Representing:
Default

on topic - Butler / Derozan = better defense than Derozan / Barbosa.
Kleiza is average defender at best, but he+Derozan would still be better than Derozan/Barbosa. And it's likely even the better offensive unit once Kleiza is close to 100, anyway.

So, I don't see much point to do it. The league is full of big long 3s right now. Or 4s playing at the 3 spot. And generally, they are high scoring. Putting a bad defender at 3 WHILE putting equally bad and shorter, older defender at 2 just doesn't make much sense.
ValanciunasFanboy is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright RaptorsForum.com 2005-2011

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24