We should've drafted... - Page 4
Old 11-17-2009, 02:37 PM   #61 (permalink)
is pounding

Senior Member
 
VanCity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,940
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A00715890 View Post
but do you think jennings would be putting those numbers if he were in a Raptors uniform?...and say bucks got deozan, we would be drooling over the numbers he would be putting up, he would easily get the start over charlie bell and average 15 ppg....and once again, jennings might be a better player in the long run, jack is a better fit for us right now...

and looking back at last years team, Jennnigs is everything we dont need and Jack is everything we do need...

Jennings is a jump shotting under sized player who rarely plays defense.....he reminds me of ramon sessions, who had a 44 point game and has had more impressive games...

Jack plays defense, is tough as nails, and is a slasher....all the things we lacked last season....
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuCa00795 View Post
A00 all you are saying is Jack is a proven starters and Jennings has only played 8 games. That means jack shit to me. Jack is getting beat right now by backup point guards in the league. Jennings is 14th in the league in assists to, with limited players to pass to. He is also 4th in rookie rebounding. He's a beast. I am not really arguing that I wish the Raptors would have taken Jenning, but Jennings would fit any situation better then Jack.
iam not gonna argue anymore....jack is a million times better fit for us then jennings is....and for the 100th time.....jennings might have a better career but jack is a perfect fir for us....hes plays defense....we dont need anymore scoring...were the best offensive team in the league...we need tough defensive players.....jennings isnt that player....
VanCity is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 02:40 PM   #62 (permalink)
Waiting for DD's 1st in game wind mill Dunk

Senior Member

 
halphbreedballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: T.O.
Posts: 4,741
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A00715890 View Post
iam not gonna argue anymore....jack is a million times better fit for us then jennings is....and for the 100th time.....jennings might have a better career but jack is a perfect fir for us....hes plays defense....we dont need anymore scoring...were the best offensive team in the league...we need tough defensive players.....jennings isnt that player....
True! But a Jose 4 Jennings swap instead of swapping for Jack, would be pretty sick!
halphbreedballer is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 02:56 PM   #63 (permalink)
back

Senior Member
 
DuCa00795's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Maratimes
Posts: 3,119
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A00715890 View Post
iam not gonna argue anymore....jack is a million times better fit for us then jennings is....and for the 100th time.....jennings might have a better career but jack is a perfect fir for us....hes plays defense....we dont need anymore scoring...were the best offensive team in the league...we need tough defensive players.....jennings isnt that player....
Jennings would fit better for jack. I think a star in the league is a better fit then Jack. We just need better overall team defence strategy.
DuCa00795 is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 03:29 PM   #64 (permalink)
KABOOOOOOOSHHHH

straight out of COMPTON
 
CB4Real's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,284
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by $-centz View Post
Brandon Jennings
No
CB4Real is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 03:29 PM   #65 (permalink)
confused why the raptors are so consistantly inconsistant

Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 843
Representing:
Default

Everyone says we shouldve taken Iggy instead of Hoffa. We shouldve taken al jefferson and then Roy over Bargs.
the_ raps_analyst is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 04:07 PM   #66 (permalink)
is pounding

Senior Member
 
VanCity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,940
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuCa00795 View Post
Jennings would fit better for jack. I think a star in the league is a better fit then Jack. We just need better overall team defence strategy.
you're a fanboy...
VanCity is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 04:52 PM   #67 (permalink)
back

Senior Member
 
DuCa00795's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Maratimes
Posts: 3,119
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A00715890 View Post
you're a fanboy...
You're calling me a fanboy because you cannot formulate a legitimate argument which shows that Jennings would not fit our system. What are you again, 14?

I am not saying I necessarily want Jennings, but for you to say Jack "fits the role" better is a Jack fanboy. Anyone in their right mind would take Jennings in millisecond, no matter the situation.

Give me an argument or get over it.
DuCa00795 is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 05:37 PM   #68 (permalink)
is pounding

Senior Member
 
VanCity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,940
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuCa00795 View Post
You're calling me a fanboy because you cannot formulate a legitimate argument which shows that Jennings would not fit our system. What are you again, 14?

I am not saying I necessarily want Jennings, but for you to say Jack "fits the role" better is a Jack fanboy. Anyone in their right mind would take Jennings in millisecond, no matter the situation.

Give me an argument or get over it.
give you an argument?

have you read any of my posts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by A00715890 View Post
hes plays defense....we dont need anymore scoring...were the best offensive team in the league...we need tough defensive players.....jennings isnt that player...
why don't you give me an argument?
all you've said is that hes a star and thats why we should get him...
how the fuck is he a star?...how do you know that?...hes payed 8 fucking games....what dont you understand?...lebron is a star...dwade is a star....bosh is a star.....kobe is a star.....jennings isnt....get over yourself...if you dont like being called a fanboy, then stop acting like one....

Last edited by VanCity; 11-17-2009 at 05:40 PM.
VanCity is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 05:46 PM   #69 (permalink)
back

Senior Member
 
DuCa00795's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Maratimes
Posts: 3,119
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A00715890 View Post
give you an argument?

have you read any of my posts?



why don't you give me an argument?
all you've said is that hes a star and thats why we should get him...
how the fuck is he a star?...how do you know that?...hes payed 8 fucking games....what dont you understand?...lebron is a star...dwade is a star....bosh is a star.....kobe is a star.....jennings isnt....get over yourself...if you dont like being called a fanboy, then stop acting like one....
You have said the Jack plays defence...That is about it. Which he is not even that great at. Jennings battles against the top PG's night in and night out. I am saying Jennings is a star on the rise, well you are trying to say Jack in the sitiuation is better then Jennings if we had him as backup. That is untrue. Jennings is playing like a star right now. He is tearing the league up. These numbers aren't going to randomly stop happening. Stop going on a 5 year old temper tantrum and rebuttal me. If not, stop being a Jack fanboy.
DuCa00795 is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 05:51 PM   #70 (permalink)
is pounding

Senior Member
 
VanCity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,940
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuCa00795 View Post
You have said the Jack plays defence...That is about it. Which he is not even that great at. Jennings battles against the top PG's night in and night out. I am saying Jennings is a star on the rise, well you are trying to say Jack in the sitiuation is better then Jennings if we had him as backup. That is untrue. Jennings is playing like a star right now. He is tearing the league up. These numbers aren't going to randomly stop happening. Stop going on a 5 year old temper tantrum and rebuttal me. If not, stop being a Jack fanboy.
once again.....we dont need scoring(thats all jennings is good at)....we need defense and toughness....we aleady are the best offensive team in the league....therefore jack is ore helpfull to us then jennings....i rest my case....
VanCity is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 06:08 PM   #71 (permalink)
back

Senior Member
 
DuCa00795's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Maratimes
Posts: 3,119
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A00715890 View Post
once again.....we dont need scoring(thats all jennings is good at)....we need defense and toughness....we aleady are the best offensive team in the league....therefore jack is ore helpfull to us then jennings....i rest my case....
Since when has Jack provided any defence for us? In case you haven't noticed Calderon has been playing better defence at the point position then Jack. If you rest your case then you are epically failing. Jennings is probably a better defender then Jack, because Calderon is a better defender then Jack...Which make a pylon a better defender then both, and Jennings is a better defender then a pylon. If our defence is as bad as it is, one player off the bench playing (bad)defence wouldn't make that big of a difference. A top scorer and assist player in the game would improve the team overall, guaranteed.
DuCa00795 is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 08:37 PM   #72 (permalink)
#northernUjirising

member
 
Someguy again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,375
Representing:
Default

The reason why Jennings is scoring alot is because he is the biggest scoring options on a scrub infested Bucks bench.

Redd out, and only Bogut, Warrick is the only real scoring threat on that team besides Jennings, during his time in lottomotica also in Oak Hill I saw in some games that he plays active defense especially in Euro when he wasn't the leading scorer but a distributor and defensive PG and the coaching staff in Lottomotica worked on that.

Yes maybe drafting Jennings would've made the Raptors backcourt a bit more defensively sound and the 2nd lineup would be absolute rape coming off the bench, but I think we just needed Jack more because of his knowledge of the game and experience with playing NBA tested PGs, besides when Jennings scored 55, Monta Ellis and Curry scored 39 points together and those were his defensive assignments.
Someguy again is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 12:41 PM   #73 (permalink)
cool

The Beast Is Here!
 
$-centz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 317
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CB4Real View Post
No
why not? I'm a DeRozan fan but if we drafted Jennings all this stupid talk about trade Calderon and Jack should start would be nullified!
$-centz is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blair's reactions after getting drafted late Nites NBA Talk 12 07-02-2009 05:03 PM
Top 10 Players who were drafted 4th Apollo NBA Talk 0 09-19-2008 03:18 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright RaptorsForum.com 2005-2011

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24