Raptors Forum | Toronto Raptors Forums & Message Boards

Raptors Forum | Toronto Raptors Forums & Message Boards (http://www.raptorsforum.com/f/)
-   Toronto Raptors (http://www.raptorsforum.com/f/f5/)
-   -   Swirsky Officially Becomes a Canadian (http://www.raptorsforum.com/f/f5/swirsky-officially-becomes-canadian-358.html)

Dr. J. Naismith 01-14-2008 10:57 PM

Swirsky Officially Becomes a Canadian
 
Congrats to Chuck .... nauseating to some because of his homerism, but can't fault the guy for his passion of Raptors basketball and for his love of this country. I'm happy for him. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck Swirsky
Today I will officially become a Canadian citizen. I am humbled and honoured.

I would like to thank MLSE for their support over the years as Richard Peddie, Tom Anselmi, Liana Ward Bristol, John Shannon and Chris Hebb have been encouraging. The folks in 307-Raps TV: Dan Gladman, Nicole Anderson, Frank Hayward and Ashley Boland have been invaluable as well. Our TV traveling crew of Jack Armstrong, Matt Bloom, Troy Clara, Paul Graham, Leo Rautins and John Rusin are outstanding professionals. Nelson Millman of the Fan 590 brought me here 10 seasons ago and without question it's the best professional decision I have ever made. I owe a lot to Nelson Millman, a man who is a pioneer in sports talk radio in Canada. It would have been a very safe choice to hire a home grown Canadian in 1998 to call Raptors' games but Nelson thought outside the box and persuaded me to leave WJR Radio and the University of Michigan for the NBA.

I flat out love Toronto and admire what this country stands for. As a dual citizen I will maintain my passion and enthusiasm for Canada when discussing personal and business opportunities with associates in the United States.

By nature I am a positive person. That's the way I was raised and I haven't changed. I always look for the good in people and hopefully that reflects in my broadcasting style. I want to express that to all Canadians that you should be proud of "our" country and to be patriotic and proud.

And Mike Ulmer's little blurb on Chuck becoming Canadian today. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Ulmer
There were homemakers, businesspeople, civil servants and one sports announcer. Seattle native Chuck Swirsky, the voice of the Toronto Raptors, waved his tiny flag with the rest. It’s been a decade since Swirsky drove across the Ambassador Bridge that links Detroit and Windsor. He was coming for a try in Canada. When he was a kid all he knew about Canada was that the bacon and maple syrup were good and that Vancouver was a pretty city. Even, as an adult making that drive he didn’t know a whole lot more.

“My first impression when I made that drive from Detroit was ‘this is a huge city, a huge market” he said. There was opportunity for Swirsky, but there was also something more.

“What I love about Canada,” he said, “is the people, the diversity, the connection people have with each other here.”

Link - Click here

'trane 01-14-2008 11:00 PM

I just can't contain my enthusiasm...

Any less of a penalty for assassinating a Canadian instead if an American?

Benzo 01-14-2008 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coltrane (Post 4283)
I just can't contain my enthusiasm...

Any less of a penalty for assassinating a Canadian instead if an American?

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Acie 01-14-2008 11:30 PM

Let's not kid ourselves, he only did this to make getting through customs easier for himself. ;)

Sick, Wicked and Nasty! 01-15-2008 08:42 AM

Well obviously i'm a supporter of the swirsk. I consider it asinine to pay enough mind to a team's announcer to have a hate-on for him... but whatever floats a person's boat. Congrats to the Swirsk for becoming one of us :)

MikeToronto 01-15-2008 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coltrane (Post 4283)
I just can't contain my enthusiasm...

Any less of a penalty for assassinating a Canadian instead if an American?

Could I please, please carry the ammo? ;)

'trane 01-15-2008 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeToronto (Post 4367)
Could I please, please carry the ammo? ;)

Hey, I don't need all the fun to myself. We can just do it Caesar-style. I just get to go first.

'trane 01-15-2008 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sick, Wicked and Nasty! (Post 4303)
Well obviously i'm a supporter of the swirsk. I consider it asinine to pay enough mind to a team's announcer to have a hate-on for him... but whatever floats a person's boat. Congrats to the Swirsk for becoming one of us :)

With all due respect SWAN, how can you keep him out of mind when you have to listen to him all game, every game, spewing the same catch-phrases, the same ludicrous nick-names, the same weak-ass ball-busting arguments with Leo - talk about asinine. He just yammers away the whole time, rarely commenting on the game at hand, and always delivering the lamest possible commentary on the action.

Now, we can disagree on whether his commentary is good or not - obviously I think it's terrible - but the point is that if you find it irritating, it's impossible to keep it out of mind. It takes away from the enjoyment of the game. Constantly.

MikeToronto 01-15-2008 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coltrane (Post 4378)
Hey, I don't need all the fun to myself. We can just do it Caesar-style. I just get to go first.

Et tu, Brute? ;)

'trane 01-15-2008 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeToronto (Post 4389)
Et tu, Brute? ;)

Let me be surrounded by fat men.
Sleek-headed men, such as sleep o'nights.
Yon Cassius has a lean and hungry look. He thinks too much, such men are dangerous.

MikeToronto 01-15-2008 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coltrane (Post 4392)
Let me be surrounded by fat men.
Sleek-headed men, such as sleep o'nights.
Yon Cassius has a lean and hungry look. He thinks too much, such men are dangerous.

:clapping:

Sick, Wicked and Nasty! 01-15-2008 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coltrane (Post 4387)
With all due respect SWAN, how can you keep him out of mind when you have to listen to him all game, every game, spewing the same catch-phrases, the same ludicrous nick-names, the same weak-ass ball-busting arguments with Leo - talk about asinine. He just yammers away the whole time, rarely commenting on the game at hand, and always delivering the lamest possible commentary on the action.

Now, we can disagree on whether his commentary is good or not - obviously I think it's terrible - but the point is that if you find it irritating, it's impossible to keep it out of mind. It takes away from the enjoyment of the game. Constantly.

First off have you ever listened to other team's broadcasts? Their broadcasters are just as homeristic and biased...only few of them have a personality..they're just drones that lull you to sleep. In other words, dont' hate chuck for supporting the team he is paid by..he's pretty complimentary of other teams, coaches and players as well and may not rip the Raps when they're sucking but he doesn't ignore their weaknesses either.

Second you comment about him rarely commentating on the game is untrue and unfair. If you really listen and not through your anti-chuck fuzzy pink ear muffs you'll notice when the action is on he's calling it...what he does do is interject historical comparisons and anecdotes for Leo or Jack to comment on from a basketball perspective, and while you may or may not want to learn about that aspect of the game, it's history and people...some of us do. I guess if you dont' that could be annoying?

Third..you DO have another option. Put your radio or internet broadcast to the fan 590 and listen to Paul and Eric!

'trane 01-15-2008 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sick, Wicked and Nasty! (Post 4408)
First off have you ever listened to other team's broadcasts? Their broadcasters are just as homeristic and biased...only few of them have a personality..they're just drones that lull you to sleep. In other words, dont' hate chuck for supporting the team he is paid by..he's pretty complimentary of other teams, coaches and players as well and may not rip the Raps when they're sucking but he doesn't ignore their weaknesses either.

Second you comment about him rarely commentating on the game is untrue and unfair. If you really listen and not through your anti-chuck fuzzy pink ear muffs you'll notice when the action is on he's calling it...what he does do is interject historical comparisons and anecdotes for Leo or Jack to comment on from a basketball perspective, and while you may or may not want to learn about that aspect of the game, it's history and people...some of us do. I guess if you dont' that could be annoying?

Third..you DO have another option. Put your radio or internet broadcast to the fan 590 and listen to Paul and Eric!

1. I don't hate on him for being a Raps supporter and a homer. I hate on him for being such an obvious company man. You'll never hear a bad word about BC or MLSE from Chuck, you can bet on that. There's a huge difference there.

2. Meh, if that's what you like, then so be it. We'll just have to disagree. He knows a ton about sports, there's no doubt, and the history is important to some. What I hate is all the other garbage - breaking balls with Leo, the whole salami and cheese insanity, calling out the threes from 'downtown wherever'. It's the same crap every game. It drives me nuts that he has to be talking at all times. This is why I love watching soccer. The commentating is sparse, well informed and necessary to the enjoyment of the game. Now I realize that this is apples and oranges, but when Chuck's not talking about the game, he's not interesting IMO, and that's a good 50% of the time.

3. Oh, I do, all the time. But it irritates me that I have to. And I know I'm not the only one. And Eric and Neal are pretty bad too. Bring back John Saunders!!!:(

Two other points:
1. The catch phrases are so silly by now. I'm willing to be that we couldn't tell the difference between the talking bobble-head Swirsk and the real thing. It's just bad Chuck cliche after bad Chuck cliche, all the time. He's like a robot, inserting excitement by using pre-programmed cliche phrases and vocal tones even when it's not exciting - "OH BABY WHAT A PLAY!!!!!" when it's just a lay-in, for example.
2. He has no idea what he's saying. "Eating some rim", "NBA facial", c'mon, is nobody pointing the obvious out to him? How can you be such a goody-two-shoes to not know what those terms mean? This kind of thing drives me nuts. I just find him to be such a douche.

I'm sorry I felt the need to get on Chuck a bit here. Your opinion is yours, and mine is mine, and we don't need to argue about it. I certainly don't mean to insult you, but I just can't take Chuck anymore. I find every moment of his commentary excruciating.

MikeTO and I can't be the only ones, can we?

ClingRap 01-15-2008 03:44 PM

Cling is with you coltrane. maybe i can drive the getaway chariot if mike is carrying the ammo!

MikeToronto 01-15-2008 04:44 PM

The soccer comment is bang on - I would love to listen to at least one Raps game commented by Jack Armstrong alone and to have him in as laconic mode as possible. I'd much rather be listening to the noises of the game (squeaks, swishes, occasional play call or even swearing) than all that "the fade, the fire..." nonsense.

ClingRap 01-15-2008 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeToronto (Post 4476)
The soccer comment is bang on - I would love to listen to at least one Raps game commented by Jack Armstrong alone and to have him in as laconic mode as possible. I'd much rather be listening to the noises of the game (squeaks, swishes, occasional play call or even swearing) than all that "the fade, the fire..." nonsense.

indeed. all of the schtick, chuck or any other broadcaster who subscribes to cliche, muddies the opportunity for differentiating perspectives of a given event. the possibilites for seeing some of the nuances, what sort of things a given viewer's attention is drawn to is greatly polluted by the commentator, and what they see. there are some whom i like, like armstrong. i like what they see. chuck only sees what he's paid or instructed to see.

Claudius 01-15-2008 06:24 PM

I too have been in the anti-chuck campaign.

Hell, I have a friend of mine who lived in Detroit when he was broadcasting there. He was run out of town for being such a poor announcer. This is Detroit. A city that knows it sports. They hated him. Toronto saw him and then scooped him up because he had experience in play calling and would give them a stable team (it went from ugh Rod Black, to John Saunders and back and forth).

And again, I too would love to see a soccer type of presentation. Let the game speak for itself. Fuck, god knows how many times I have said that already....

Acie 01-15-2008 11:29 PM

I loved John Saunders. Too bad the Raps told him he had to live in Toronto year round.

Sick, Wicked and Nasty! 01-16-2008 09:31 AM

Well i have this then to say to all you anti-chuckers... na na na na na he's the broadcaster deal with it ;) :D :D :D

fancylad 01-16-2008 11:11 AM

My opinion:

Chuck's OK. and that's it. somtimes, fine OFTEN, he's a bit much to handle and truthfully he is a corny mofo. but i've gotten used to him. And having listened to other commentators, i don't mind the job he's doing.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright RaptorsForum.com 2005-2011


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24