Anthony Davis @ SF - Page 2
Old 03-01-2012, 12:43 PM   #21 (permalink)
.

Senior Member
 
carp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 11,494
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackson Filth View Post
not whining, calling out. i'd gladly be a hero to someone who doesn't want bullshitters and trolls cluttering the worthy opinions of people who actually watch and enjoy the game.
Boohoo hero. You're so full of shit. Such a troll.



Carry on with your personal crusade to try and insult me.... I love a pathetic show!
carp is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 12:44 PM   #22 (permalink)
I believe in Masai!

giant steps

 
'trane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,702
Representing:
Default

both of you guys can the douchebag act please.
'trane is online now   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 05:22 PM   #23 (permalink)
LOG
is pounding the rock!

Senior Member
 
LOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 9,296
Representing:
Default

Doesn't us landing Davis would most likely mean that Bargs is Gone?
LOG is online now   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 05:30 PM   #24 (permalink)
baking the cookies of discontent.

Corner 3
 
finstock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,140
Representing:
Default

Keep him in and around the paint. A big man rotation of Bargs, Val, Davis, Ed or Amir (one should be moved should this scenario pan out), and perhaps Grey, looks good to me. Once and if Val and Davis develop into studs - probably a few years down the road -, move Bargs to another team or the bench.
finstock is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 05:32 PM   #25 (permalink)
Gam zeh ya'avor

The Gatekeeper
 
MikeToronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,999
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LOG View Post
Doesn't us landing Davis would most likely mean that Bargs is Gone?
It appears that it would mean playing rotation of Bargs, Jonas and Davis heavily - a great luxury to have. Yes, it would also mean that one of them could be traded later, but again - who cares? Great players bring great returns.
MikeToronto is online now   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 05:43 PM   #26 (permalink)
LOG
is pounding the rock!

Senior Member
 
LOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 9,296
Representing:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oneironaught View Post
Keep him in and around the paint. A big man rotation of Bargs, Val, Davis, Ed or Amir (one should be moved should this scenario pan out), and perhaps Grey, looks good to me. Once and if Val and Davis develop into studs - probably a few years down the road -, move Bargs to another team or the bench.
But this would mean loosing trade value of Bargs as he gets older.. I think we should keep Bargs for a year and make sure that JV and Davis is a real deal, than trade Andrea for young guard or sf
LOG is online now   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 05:51 PM   #27 (permalink)
rootin for the eagles, boise state, the leafs, raps, and jays

Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Halifax
Posts: 5,577
Representing:
Default

Were very likely not getting Davis, that is all.
Chiggmo is offline   Boss Key Wife Key Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright RaptorsForum.com 2005-2011

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24