Bbc sport website is running a live page with reactions from deadline day. People sending in comments. One comment the mods decided to publish was that ericksen cost 31mill less than ozil but created 125 chances to only 85 by ozil, so he's obviously a better buy.
I sent in a reply (prob won't be published,) saying that ericksen played in an easier league, was his team's sole creator whereas ozil played with other class players and ericksen cost a lot less coz he only had 1yr left on his contract. Both great signings but ozil is the better player.
Don't wanna sound like a smart-arse, but come on man, this shit is obvious!