Originally Posted by TORaptor4Ever
Think that the Knicks haven't been benefitting from Novak's contributions?
He's another player who fits that mold... except unlike Bargs
he actually does his job WELL and helps his team.
sure it benefits, most players benefit their teams. Would you take nowak over amare though? Would the lakers consider trading gasol for bonner to improve their team? Bonner, Nowak, Frye are guys you pick up to fill your team, deep rotation players who will give you a boost. They're not guys you rely on to do the heavy lifting. As bad as amare has been, no one in their right mind would take bonner over him. I'm only giving the amare example because you seem blinded when Bargnani
names come up ...