Originally Posted by Carlito
Now that's a great question ..
For me it's easy ... It's Vince all the way ... He had the kind of talent that could of made him the best NBAer in history.
Bargs and Vince do have some similar characteristics ... they are both lazy and have fragile mental make-ups.
You think Bargs
has a fragile mental makeup? I always just thought he was aloof.....couldn't care less what anyone thinks.
But I'm not sure the answer is so clear cut. Vince became a multi-time all-star, put up big numbers several times in games, defied teams to stop him and has a shot at the hall of fame. Granted he sucked his way out of town. Bargs
with size, some athleticism, a shot, can handle the ball and given ample opportunity may not achieve even one accolade his whole career. Sad, but when he's done, he will probably just fade away.
Sorry about the hijack.