Originally Posted by MikeToronto
I'd support those saying that stars are more important than depth - in fact, I've been complaining about the overabundance of bench-level players who start on our team for years now.
However, if one can't quite attract super-stars, one can certainly improve depth. We still lack a franchise player, or even an All-Star level player for that matter, and so are not likely to go anywhere - and that makes me sad long-term.
It's not like i'm against depth. Obviously it's good to have more options, but it's just that we don't have any can't miss options right now, and those teams that do, regardless of their second or third options will always end up on top.