i pointed out the inaccuracies in your op in my first response. i have argued that you made several others as this discussion went on. it should be fairly evident by now which parts i think were inaccurate.
i'm not sure how my answers are preachy, but even if they are this isn't much of a criticism. i could point out the logical fallacy here too, but i don't think that is going to get us anywhere.
i don't think you have any way to claim 'most'. this is an unprovable assumption, and i would argue is therefore irrelevant. it is a guess, and hardly advances your position.
anybody who reads this and has real knowledge of what constitutes these logical fallacies is welcome to point out which of them i am incorrect in attributing to benzo's points.