Originally Posted by LX
I would suggest that he made it with his many accomplishments in college and two gold medals weighing heavily, as well as overachieving with his teams in the NBA. Vince has one gold medal, and one championship where he wasn't exactly the standout player, and a career of underachieving in the NBA.
but by including over/underachieving in your decision making it turns it into an individual standard instead of a general one. you can't just say because someone didn't play to his full potential then he's not HOF worthy. what if him underachieving still makes him a top tier player?
was the 37th player to 20,000 points. thats at least gotta mean something right? be objective