Originally Posted by thought
Easy to judge when you're not the one in the middle of a life or death situation.
there's an element of truth to this, but even so, the entire situation doesn't seem to add up to "insurgency" just by looking at it. why would there be one guy with an rpg among a dozen others with no weapons walking around in the middle of the street? and if that weren't enough, why take out anyone but him? and why engage a second time when it's still clear nobody else has a "weapon"?