Originally Posted by Ligeia
Actually, what I am arguing is that most naturopathic treatments do not work, and if they do it can be credited to something other than the treatment itself. Your argument is that they do work. I'm asking you to present an example of a specific naturopathic treatment (like, say, homeopathy) that you think works.
Your claim that CAM is even remotely close to evidence-based medicine is simply false on its face.
May I ask further: what makes one naturopath real, and another one not? And how did you arrive at the 65% number?
I know there are a few people that scam people by pretending to be naturopaths. This stuff works for reasons science has not yet figured out and one day will.