Originally Posted by Claudius
I think what ACIE is saying though is, was Chris a key contributor on a pereniall championship contender? Or was he the benefactor of having good stats on a bad team?
Personally though, I do agree that he should be a HOFer. I believe he was a revolutionary player for the PF position and really set the tone for what teams looked for in a PF (not simply a rebounder, but a guy you can run the offence through by utilizing their passing skills and also being able to hit a 20ft jumper consistently). However, what will always hurt Chris is his legacy of never really living up to his hype that surrounded him what he left Michigan. I dunno I say he gets in, but it won't be for a while.
the Kings were considered contenders, werent they?