I was thinking more he's more like Charlie V. Which is fine for the 9th pick. I wouldn't complain if we took him.
And I want to draft Henderson at 9. He's athletic, smart, and good at everything including elite defense, but passed on because he's a junior who projects as a "role player at best". Roy and Granger were also 4th year players (Henderson is 3rd ftr) who were athletic, smart, good at everything, and projected as role players. Not that I expect his ceiling to be those guys, I'd be happy with 12/4/2 with good defense and intangibles, which is starter level... in this draft I'm happy with that. But the 'we should pass on him because he has no upside' thing is a total myth.
Last edited by The MVP of West Hollywood; 05-16-2009 at 03:20 PM.